Jonathan Mridha vs Adam Heinonen Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Mridha vs A. Heinonen

Jonathan Mridha
SWE
w
l
w
l
l
l
w
l
l
l
0
Win
1
Played
1
Win
30
Age
23
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
-
880
C. Rank
786
444
Best Rank
735
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.5K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Adam Heinonen
SWE
w
w
l
l
l
l
l
w
l
l
0
Win
1
Played
1
Win
30
Age
23
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
-
880
C. Rank
786
444
Best Rank
735
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.5K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Mridha 0 - 1 Heinonen
They have played 1 sets in total, with Jonathan Mridha winning 0 and Adam Heinonen winning 1. The last match between Adam Heinonen and Jonathan Mridha was at the M25 Kalmar, 11-05-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Adam Heinonen getting the victory 3-0 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mridha | 0 |
| Heinonen | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Kalmar(05-11-22)
Adam Heinonen
3
Jonathan Mridha
0
J. Mridha vs A. Heinonen H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,520 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.67% (275-219) | Career Total W/L | 59.01% (95-66) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 4 | Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Mridha vs A. Heinonen Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jonathan Mridha has won 44.91% of points on their second serve, while Adam Heinonen has won 41.73%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jonathan Mridha, in recent form, has won 45.73% of their opponent's second serve points, while Adam Heinonen has won 57.74%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.29% and 32.03% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jonathan Mridha has saved 55.00% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Adam Heinonen has saved 46.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jonathan Mridha has won 37.50% of matches played (W/L 9/15), with Adam Heinonen winning 44.44% (W/L 8/10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jonathan Mridha has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 62/43), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 56/55). Adam Heinonen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 34/14), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 5/8).
- Player level: In the last year, Jonathan Mridha has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 37.50% of matches (W/L 9/15), where as Adam Heinonen has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 8/6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jonathan Mridha winning 0 times and Adam Heinonen being victorious 0 times. They have played 1 sets in total, with Jonathan Mridha winning 0 and Adam Heinonen winning 1.
- The last match between Jonathan Mridha and Adam Heinonen was at the M25 Kalmar, 11-05-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Adam Heinonen getting the victory 3-0 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:9:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jonathan Mridha has played against opponents with an average rank of 409.58 while Adam Heinonen has played against players with an average rank of 498.94.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jonathan Mridha has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Adam Heinonen has won 29% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jonathan Mridha has converted 40.74% of breakpoint opportunities, and Adam Heinonen has converted 35.19% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Jonathan Mridha vs Adam Heinonen Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Mridha vs A. Heinonen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 0 | Games Won | 3 |
| 0:9:0 | Average Match Time | 0:9:0 |
| 67% (6/9) | 1st Serve % | 83% (5/6) |
| 17% (1/6) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (3/5) |
| 0% (0/3) | 2nd Serve Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (2/2) |
| 33% (2/6) | Return Points Win % | 89% (8/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Mridha 45%, Heinonen 44%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Mridha 47%, Heinonen 52%.
Break Points Saved %: Mridha 54%, Heinonen 56%.
J. Mridha Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-0 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 7-6(3) | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
A. Heinonen Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 7-6(3) 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 2-6 6-4 7-6(4) | ||
R1 | W | 3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-0 2-6 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 5-7 6-1 6-4 | ||

J. Mridha vs A. Heinonen Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.67% (275/219) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.01% (95/66) |
| 54.93% (613/503) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.64% (215/158) |
| 52.38% (5470/4973) | Games Win/Loss | 53.37% (1922/1679) |
| 59.05% (62/43) | Hard Win/Loss | 70.83% (34/14) |
| 56.62% (154/118) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.41% (47/41) |
| 50.43% (59/58) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56.00% (14/11) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1219 | Aces Total | 303 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 889 | Total Double Faults | 416 |
| 1:14:24 | Average Match Time | 1:7:45 |
| 526.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 334.57 |
| 62% (14934/24097) | 1st Serve % | 65% (4804/7435) |
| 68% (10163/14934) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (3118/4804) |
| 50% (4606/9163) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1180/2631) |
| 43% (1043/2445) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (364/827) |
| 41% (9765/24044) | Return Points Win % | 42% (3142/7418) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 18.18% (2/9) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43.75% (21/27) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 57.97% (251/182) | Futures W/L | 60.51% (95/62) |
| 56% (269/478) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (92/158) |
| 57% (4/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 51% (70/138) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (15/33) |
| 52% (68/130) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (25/52) |
| 88% (258/226) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (91/81) |
| 12% (258/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (91/10) |
| 21% (235/49) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (70/14) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
01:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction01:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction02:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction04:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction07:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction03:00 PM 18/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
05:00
H2H 0-0
05:45
H2H 0-0
07:00
H2H 0-0
07:10
H2H 0-0
07:10
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal